Language

Continue on this page in your preferred language.

Settings

Adjust this browser’s reading experience. Changes take effect immediately.

AX26-AI-101 · 2026-27

Supervised Learning

Connect model assumptions to training objectives, local optimisation, and an evaluation that does not leak future information.

Estimated study
150 hours
Level
Undergraduate level
Topics
8

Course topics

  1. 01Objectives and models
  2. 02Linear regression as an optimisation problem
  3. 03Logistic classification and likelihood
  4. 04Gradients and local descent
  5. 05Gradient descent and learning rates
  6. 06Regularisation and inductive bias
  7. 07Validation, leakage and generalisation
  8. 08Examination synthesis
Detailed syllabus and learning aims

Module aims

Write a loss, a gradient step, and a validation protocol as three different objects, and refuse to treat training error as expected risk.

Course outline

  1. 01 Objectives and models 20h

    Learning result Distinguish a prediction task, a model class, and a training objective.

    Formative check Four-option check

  2. 02 Linear regression as an optimisation problem 20h

    Learning result Derive the normal equations from squared loss and say when the design is linear in parameters.

    Formative check Written derivation

  3. 03 Logistic classification and likelihood 20h

    Learning result Derive binary cross-entropy from a Bernoulli likelihood.

    Formative check Written derivation

  4. 04 Gradients and local descent 20h

    Learning result Justify the negative gradient as a local descent direction and state the first-order remainder.

    Formative check Written derivation

  5. 05 Gradient descent and learning rates 15h

    Learning result For a one-dimensional quadratic, derive a constant-step interval that contracts.

    Formative check Written derivation

  6. 06 Regularisation and inductive bias 15h

    Learning result Prove uniqueness of the ridge solution for a strictly positive penalty parameter even when X is rank deficient.

    Formative check Written derivation

  7. 07 Validation, leakage and generalisation 20h

    Learning result Design a split that respects how new data arrive and exhibit a leakage failure.

    Formative check Counterexample

  8. 08 Examination synthesis 20h

    Learning result Assemble objective, optimiser caveat, and evaluation into one short written argument.

    Formative check Written derivation

Learning results

Given a prediction task, specify a model class, a loss, an optimiser limitation, and a leakage-aware evaluation.

Subject skills

Empirical risk, linear and logistic models, gradients, ridge, train/validation/test splits.

Transferable skills

Report what a number measures; keep evaluation independent of fitting choices.

Related introductory topics
01Objectives and models3 topics
  1. Empirical risk and loss functions
  2. Linear regression as an optimisation problem
  3. Logistic classification and likelihood
Chapter link
02Optimisation and regularisation3 topics
  1. Gradients and local descent
  2. Gradient descent and learning rates
  3. Regularisation and inductive bias
Chapter link
03Evaluation and examination synthesis2 topics
  1. Validation, leakage and generalisation
  2. Supervised-learning examination synthesis
Chapter link
Learning depths

Conceptual Understanding

Form a clear picture of loss, models and generalisation before manipulating algorithms.

Independent Problem Solving

Choose methods and justify evaluation choices on concrete learning problems.

Derivation and Transfer

Derive update rules and transfer the argument to a related modelling setting.

Sign in to AXIOVUM

IP Geolocation by DB-IP · CC BY 4.0